On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/04/2010 12:04 EDT, William Herrin wrote: >> I suspect the DNS is not the right vehicle for name to identifier to >> locator resolution. It's a tribute to the DNS that that it's almost >> flexible enough to do a credible job but DNS's design was focused on
> I'm not concerned about scaling, I think we can handle that. I'm > concerned about privacy. More soon. Hi Scott, I'm not so worried about scaling... DNS is pretty remarkable. I just think that working around DNS's architecture instead of defining a supercedent will in some respects unnecessarily complicate and in others unnecessarily limit ILNP. -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
