In einer eMail vom 27.10.2010 00:54:11 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:25 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > I am not an expert in compact routing. The good thing: The CR experts > realized themselves how bad it is, hence came up with the term stretch > as to measure its weakness. Amusing, but wrong. Stretch is a quantifiable measure of how _well_ a routing algorithm performs, and is used in the compact routing work as the primary trade-off against routing state. In particular, the algorithms presented in the literature define provable bounds on achievable state with respect to the state requirements. Agreed, and please excuse my emotions against CR: But it is not correct to bash on all kinds of hierarchical routing concepts either. Nor is it appropriate to infer from CR that scalable solutions aren't possible at all. Heiner
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
