Wes,

My maybe not-so-professional last few posts aside, is
this really called for? I mean, when something is *wrong*,
just because a few people who may or may not have noticed
voted in favor does not make it *right*.

We have the opportunity to get things right here; let's
not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Fred
[email protected]  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of George, Wes E [NTK]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:36 PM
> To: Robin Whittle; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rrg] Consensus check on design goals - Fred's 
> mistaken votecounted as valid
> 
> > Officially:   "In favor: 12
> >                Against: 1
> >                Vocally abstain: 1
> >                Spam: 1"
> >
> > He got your vote fair-and-square and is unapologetic about counting
> > it, despite you expressing your concern before the final count that
> > you made it in error.
> 
> [WES] Spare me the righteous indignation, Robin.
> I don't know about anywhere else, but in the US, ignorance of 
> the platform/views of the candidate you voted for doesn't 
> give you license to rescind or change your vote, so let's 
> stop demonizing the process or trying to champion the cause 
> of the supposedly disenfranchised just because it didn't go 
> the way you wanted. You want this to be fair, open, and 
> independent, but yet you also seem to want to be able to 
> change the results. It's a binary choice. Pick one.
> 
> Either way, allow me to update the above numbers to reflect 
> Fred's confusion:
> 
> UNOfficially:   "In favor: 11
>                 Against: 2
>                 Vocally abstain: 1
>                 Spam: 1"
> This changes the situation exactly...how?
> 
> Wes
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel proprietary information 
> intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by 
> others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> 
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to