Marcelo, Hannu and all, clearly it's interesting. Would you pre-distribute routing information or have one or more mapping request phases? How do we deal with tradeoffs between state maintenance and reliability?
Do you want to do this in routing or in some other signaling? Consider NUTSS and the failed attempt at the EME RG. That has a policy based discovery phase that seems very related. Scott On May 10, 2011 5:35 AM, "marcelo bagnulo braun" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain? > i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different > characteristics to forward packets across domains. > Would people find this topic interesting? > > regards, marcelo > > > > El 08/05/11 19:18, Tony Li escribió: >> Hi all, >> >> It's time to start the conversation about where the RRG is headed. Towards that end, I'd like to open the floor for the discussion of topics. Any _research_ topic within the broad area of routing and addressing is appropriate. >> >> I propose the following process: we hold this discussion this month, trying to identify relevant topics. Each topic should have a succinct statement of its goals. At the end of the month, we poll to determine the interest level in the various topics. Those that seem to have critical mass are recommended to the IRTF Chair for consideration. >> >> The default answer, if no topic has critical mass, is for the RG to go on hiatus. >> >> Any questions or comments on the process? >> >> Any proposals of research topics? >> >> The floor is open... >> >> Tony >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rrg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg >> > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
