Well, this will be fun. Yes Noel, you're right, this group didn't produce any routing revolutions, and loc/id separation is about problems on the identity function side, not routing ... but this group's best accomplishment imho was to understand that and spread the knowledge.
Now I'll go back to doing good things with higher layer identities. Ciao. Scott [email protected] wrote: > From: Tony Li <[email protected]> > The publication of these RFCs concludes our long standing work item on > a revised routing architecture. Separation of location and identity is very desirable, but it has basically nothing to do with routing (other than removing identity functionality from the names used for routing, making them a bit more tractable). We still have the same old kludgy BGP global routing system we always had, and _nothing_ has been proposed to improve/replace it. > The group has ... helped push the boundaries of routing farther > forward. Nonsense. It has produced no routing work at all. Noel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
