On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/13/12 20:17, Dae Young KIM allegedly wrote: > > OK, Shim6 is not an LIS. But, the shim is between L3 and L4 while a > > session shim would be between L4 and APP. > > Usually that's handled in libraries used by apps. We don't use X.200 > layering much. > Yes, session should be part of implementation issues. Still, one would wish for a clearly declared session concept within the TCP/IP suite, so that it is not done ad hac from one application to another but is provided as a default interface visible to all APPs. -- DY
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
