My understanding is that the packet forwarding paths, and the money
exchanges, are more complex than the picture you painted. Your picture
matches the general theory. However, I have repeatedly been told that
the reality does not match that theory.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/5/14, 11:09 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:04 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
IMHO: IPv6 won't get any boost by the IPv4 address expiration.
But shouldn't that be the most urgent RRG problem ?
Hi Heiner,
The "procedural aggregation" approaches I'll discuss are agnostic
about the IP version number. They work as well (and as poorly) for
both IPv4 and IPv6.
Before I dive in to that, does everybody follow the economics of
Internet routing as presented in my prior message? Can I answer any
questions about how it works?
Regards,
Bill Herrin
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
