Hi, Now I can provide a link to the HRA document. http://www.huawei.com/file/download.do?f=3073
Any comment is welcomed. Best regards, Xu Xiaohu > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 发送时间: 2007年11月23日 18:01 > 收件人: Xu Xiaohu > 抄送: 'Routing Research Group' > 主题: Re: A new draft about Hierarchical Routing Architecture > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:57:47PM +0100, > Xu Xiaohu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 51 lines which said: > > > These days I have received some feedbacks and questions publicly or > > privately. > > Apparently, your draft was not submitted? I do not find it in the > official repository, only in your initial message. I suggest to submit it. > > > Take mobile phone as an example, you don't feel inconvenient at the > > age of no mobile phone, but once you use it, you will find you can > > not leave it almost. I believe the cryptographic host identifier has > > some kind of character like mobile phone. > > The relationship between the deployment of mobile phones and > cryptographic identifiers is a complete mystery to me... > > > Any comment is welcomed. > > The security section certainly requires more time and effort. I've > seen many ID/loc proposals and there is a common structure: the author > has a new idea (often a variation of existing ideas), post the draft > without security analysis, find that their proposal is much better > than any other proposal, and, when they try to add security in their > proposal, they discover that their proposal becomes as complicated and > difficult as the others. > > Security is often the Achille's heel of ID/loc separation. Every > indirection is a new failure point. -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
