On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:26:44PM -0800, Tony Li wrote: > > Hi RRG, > > Over the last 9 months people have been working hard on exploring the > design space for scalable routing architectures, and new proposals continue > to appear over time. However there is also a growing desire to produce a > final recommendation. The co-chairs would like to put forth the following > proposed schedule as a strawman for discussion: > > - floor stays open for new innovative solutions > - at the same time we encourage efforts on identifying fundamental > commonalities and differences among proposals, and design tradeoffs. > - starting from March'08 we will drive the group effort towards convergence > - we hope to reach a final recommendation by March '09. >
Folks,
At the RRG meeting on Monday we talked a bit about
this ("convergence"). IIRC, Tony mentioned the
design-goals document (draft-irtf-rrg-design-goals-01.txt)
as a source of evaluation criteria. My concern is that
there is not enough detail in the draft to form the basis
of a decision process (which ever one we use, which is
another question).
So my question is: Do folks feel that this document
contains sufficient detail (at least to a first
approximation) to make an informed decision, and if not,
how do we plan to do to obtain that detail?
Thnx,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
