Iljitsch -
This means that it's important that mapping systems are designed such that they can be deployed in each of the A/B/C scenarios. I'm not sure this is the case right now.
I don't think either that this is the case since the mode of deployment is, IIUC, exactly what distinguishes APT from LISP: APT aims for deployment in ISP networks -- first locally within ISP borders, later across ISP borders --, and LISP aims for deployment in edge networks. Alternative deployment is not always possible: While I don't see a reason why APT could not be deployed also in edge networks, LISP is IMO tailored to deployment in edge networks because it uses the edge network's interior gateway protocol to synchronize status information between ingress tunnel routers. - Christian -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
