Dino, > > Whether "it's not at all bad" depends on the locality of the traffic. > > Right, the guys at UCLB are gathering data on this.
Ok. > > To preserve "truth in advertising" the LISP spec needs (a) to clearly > > spelled out the assumptions you make about the locality of the > > traffic, as well as (b) to document the system behavior if these > > assumptions > > turned out to be incorrect. > > Right, but we don't have the data yet so that is why it's not > documented. Just because "we don't have the data yet" is *not* a valid reason for why (a) and (b) are "not documented". This is because to document *assumptions* does not require the data - the data is required to test the assumptions. Likewise, documenting the system behavior if the assumptions turned out to be incorrect does not require the data. Yakov. -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
