Hi Brian, Thanks for your response.
I agree with you on this: > Certainly, no delay is better than delay. but I do not believe we should accept a new architecture which typically delays any packets more than a very short time, say 100ms at the very most. I think a few ms to a few tens of ms would be achievable in most cases with local Query Servers - meaning within a few hundred km of the caching ITRs. > I assume you mean "push-everything" schemes, and given that some > are arguing for 10^10 map entries, I have great difficulty > agreeing that any push-everything scheme is deployable. At the > 10^8 level it seems conceivable. I think such numbers beyond 10^9 are achievable by the time any such growth would occur - with a mix of caching ITRs, local Query Servers and full database ITRs. This is the principle of APT and Ivip. I discussed these large numbers of EIDs/micronets in a message "Single Host Granularity (SHG) with full database ITRs & Query Servers", which I posted yesterday, and will post again, since it has not yet appeared on the list. - Robin -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
