Hi,
On Feb 8, 2008, at 7:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the key issue is to who gains the benefits and who pays for it.
The
content providers (hosting companies) will not pay for a solution that
only offers drawbacks to them, but benefits would go to ISP. There
is no
incentive for content houses to deploy such a solution.
Indeed. One benefit I can imagine to justify a change is to support
multi-homing without having to know or do BGP-fu or figure out how to
get (and pay for) your ISPs to accept/announce your prefix(es). From
the ISP perspective, you'd look like a normal single-homed customer.
Obviously this would apply for either push or pull systems.
Regards,
-drc
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
