On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Christian Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (1) Localized mobility support within an edge network, because the > address indirection alone tracks host mobility only at the granularity > of edge networks, not access links. > > (2) Dynamic and per-host mappings between edge and transit addresses, > because the mapping for a single edge address changes when a mobile > host moves to another edge network > > (3) Trust relationships between edge networks so that a mobile host's > mapping can be changed by (or based on information of) a visited edge > network
Hi Christian, I'm okay with your first two points but the third makes an assumption that might not be warranted. You do need a trust relationship but it doesn't necessarily need to be between edge networks. The trust relationship can also be from the edge networks to one or many third-party address authorities. Also, note that item 1 can be achieved through a standard push-based IGP like OSPF given some form of AAA system for the client. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
