Excerpts from Lars Westberg on Thu, Mar 13, 2008 08:28:31AM +0100: > I am pretty confused when it comes to the definition of the problem. > If I understand it correctly, the main idea to solve a future > problem of site-multihooming. But, when I am trying to follow the > discussion, a set of very complex solutions are suggested. > > Currently, the transit backbone are built on a "connectionless" > approach whithout states. Do we intend to build a new dynamic and > statefull routing architecture? > > I understand that the granularity of "one address" per provider is > not enough, but that can easily be solved by assign a set of > adresses to a provider. The main problem I see lying in the > assumption to have dynamic mapping tables instead to have a simple > mapping rule.
Multihoming is a significant issue but not the only one. See draft-irtf-rrg-design-goals. -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
