Robin,

  As near as I can tell, everyone else already converged on a working
definition for "incrementally deployable" -- and that definition is not
consistent with your personal definition.  Further, I haven't seen any
recent support for your broader definition from others, though perhaps
I've misplaced a note someplace.

  I will also note that conversations in the hallway in Philadelphia
lead me to believe that many (possibly most) RG members do believe
that several proposals on the table (including LISP, but not limited
to LISP) are incrementally deployable.

Ran


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Reply via email to