Hi Darrel,
|> Simply this: if return packets leaving a LISP site, headed |> for a non-LISP site, use a EID as the source address, then it |> is highly likely that the packets will be dropped due to the |> source address filtering. | |It would pass a lose-mode check since the route is in the table, which |is the current best practice for multi-homed networks. Ok, but as you're transitioning to LISP, you want to remove routes to EID prefixes from the routing table. That breaks loose or strict mode. |> So you admit then that your argument about the benefits of |> hosting a PTR don't hold water? | |Sorry, I don't admit this at all. Ok cool, so assuming you've been following the conversation, is there a flaw in my argument? Tony -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
