Hi everyone, While responding to some criticisms of APT, I came upon an observation that I would like to share with the list; many of the criticisms to proposals coming out of the RRG have to do with a lack of additional features that currently do not exist on the Internet. Some examples: a fast push system that can propogate mapping changes faster than bgp can propogate routing changes, a lack of explicit mobility support, an inability to detect router failures better than IGPs currently can, etc.
IMVHO, the RRG should aim for a practical solution to solving the routing scalability problem that results in little to no degradation of current Internet services. Any additional features should be considered extra, and should only be provided if they come at little to no extra cost. The tradeoffs and side effects that come with additions will only complicate an already-complex problem space. It would be prudent not to concern ourselves with solving a whole lot of problems the Internet faces; just the one we were set out to solve. Dan Jen -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
