Lars Eggert wrote:
I must admit that I don't follow the RRG very closely very often (it requires a full-time commitment), but I don't remember the discussion around this document resulting in a consensus. But I may be wrong, and RGs don't need to operate by consensus. In any event, the document is definitely is a good start.
And I would argue it's a bad idea to aim for consensus, having attempted to do so before. That's a huge hurdle for getting work done. The IETF has it for standardization. I don't see the need for research output.
Eliot -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
