> > What I gathered from the above: > - a clearly defined set of terminology is critically important > (I saw fair number of "ID"s in a pretty short paragraph:-) > > - the terminology definition, in turn, critically depend on reaching > agreement on a set of basic concepts. > (e.g. is a wireline connectivity a special case of generally > mobile > world) > > - what falls into the basic concepts depends on the scope of the > design (e.g. the overall Internet architecture, vs. the routing > architecture with a clear understanding of its relations to the > other parts)
agree, the first thing we need to do is to define the concept clearly before architecture design,and I believe that the scope of design is the first concept to be defined since it will determine what's the best candidate of id and locator. Best regards, Xiaohu Xu -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
