On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:04:10AM +1000, Robin Whittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 194 lines which said:
> I suggest we eliminate "Translation" and "Transport" > approaches from consideration, since 19 months after > the RAWS workshop the only potentially practical > proposals are all Map-Encap. I am not sure I agree with your classification. Where do you put HIP? > Firstly, as noted in the above-linked message, during the > "transition period", in order to provide backwards compatibility, > your proposal involves deep packet inspection and modification of > traffic packets. ... > This is absolutely impossible to implement in a solution for > universal adoption as the RRG will be proposing, You may not like it but saying it is impossible is a bit strange since currently, most users today access Internet through a NAT box which typically works that way (with the limitations you mention). -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
