>>> c - The prospects for near-term (next 5 years or so) widespread >>> adoption of IPv6 - because we haven't formed a clear >>> consensus that we need to solve the IPv4 routing scaling >>> problem directly, but think it could or should be solved by >>> mass migration from IPv4 to IPv6. >> >> I haven't used the word 'migration' for years in that context. The model >> is very clearly one of long-term *coexistence* of v4 and v6. So >> v6 deployment is definitely not an excuse for ignoring v4 scaling. > >I agree.
True words - and if we take care of IPv4 routing scaling the right way IPv6 routing scaling should take care of itself. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
