I understand that for now, the co-chairs are directing the RRG towards more conceptual discussion of the design space, without specific engineering details, particularly of potential solutions.
I don't have much to contribute in that regard, because I can't constructively think about various forks in the road without going down each fork as far as I can, finding potential solutions and discussing them in as much engineering and deployment detail as possible. Other folks are keen to engage in this sort of thing too, but we need to do it without disrupting the high-level only discussions. I have a bunch of RRG messages to read and respond to - probably next week. But my responses would probably fall outside the scope of this "high-level only" conceptual discussion of the design space. If such messages are not appropriate for this list at present, can someone suggest an alternative? Routing Research Gory Details perhaps? Routing Research, Engineering and Deployment? I could run a list with public web archives myself, but it might be better if someone not so involved in the discussions ran the list. A list under the IETF or IRTF banner would probably be best. Should we continue the discussions which don't suit the RRG on the RAM list? - Robin -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
