Meta-note: the "CC" you used to send your original message to the RRG list
was invalid and unrepliable. I wonder how many replies were lost because
people ignored the mailer errors.
--Vince
----- Forwarded message from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:05:03 -0700
From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tony Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 'rrg' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Moving forward...
> Last week we did a consensus check on the following:
>
> |Our recommendation should be applicable to IPv6. It may or
> |may not also apply to IPv4, but at the very least must provide
> |a path forward for IPv6.
>
>
> It's my judgement that we have rough consensus on this. There is dissent,
> notably from Robin and Bill, but overall, it seems that we have rough
> consensus.
FWIW, put me into the more-rough, non-consensus camp that thinks providing a
solution for IPv4 is a requirement.
Speaking for myself only.
--Vince
----- End forwarded message -----
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
