On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Robin Whittle wrote:
Hi Lixia,
Yes, by "portable" I meant:
To me a PI prefix has 2 separable meanings: globally uniqueness, and
portability.
I tried to give a short version in my original message:
http://psg.com/lists/rrg/2008/msg01310.html
End-user networks need their own portable address space.
In the context of this discussion, it is assumed the space is globally
reachable - and "their own" implies the address space is globally
unique.
Robin, thanks for your long and detailed reply (I wish I could write
that fast:)
I tend to identify separable issues. We agree that a PI prefix really
means 2 things, and portability is only one of the two. That's all my
msg last night intends to clarify.
I agree with you too that RRG aims at an architectural solution to
routing scalability problem, the topic pursued on another ongoing thread
.....
BTW, can you or anyone else point me to the "Handley Proposal"?
look for the msg Mark sent to RRG
Date: February 18, 2008 9:35:09 PM PST
Subject: [RRG] Are we solving the wrong problem?
Lixia
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
