On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Noel Chiappa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My point was that, if my thinking is correct (and if it's not, can someone > please point out where I've gone wrong), it's not reasonable to > simultaneously say 'I want location/identity separation' and also say 'I > don't want to change existing host software' and 'I think a big mapping > database is not feasible'. If you want the first, one of the next two _has_ > to give; the only question is _which_.
Noel, I also agree with this statement. I note that it is predicated on the assumption that routing is required to follow business relationships. If routing was allowed to follow some more-aggregable criteria (e.g. geography) the statement might not be true. However, I agree that routing is required to follow business relationships. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
