In einer eMail vom 04.07.2008 00:37:29 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On  2008-07-04 09:23, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> The analogy between street  addresses and packet addresses for routing
> has MANY  weaknesses.
> Street routing relies on the fact that connectivity is  highly meshed.
I do not understand what these 2 sentences mean.



And just to be clear, BGP4 routing is not highly meshed. I  happened
to look at the potaroo.net data yesterday.

86.3% of active  autonomous systems are purely originators of
routes (stubs), 13.4% also  provide transit, and 0.3% are pure
transit systems. 42% of autonomous  systems originate only one prefix.

Brian


Also, the internet is a very very small network compared with the network  of 
the roads and streets.
But, see above, I do not understand. For an algorithm I doesn't matter  
whether the network is tightly meshed or lesser meshed.It would only matter, if 
 
there were no single mesh at all.
 
Heiner
 
 
 



   

Reply via email to