In einer eMail vom 22.07.2008 11:42:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The real criticism is that we ALREADY have end-user names and infrastructure addresses: FQDNs and IP addresses. Apparently that wasn't enough. How do we know that a third naming layer will do the trick? enum-inverse ( E.164 ). Just kidding. Of course, exploiting the geographical coordinates would be my answer. Obviously that can be done in many ways. If done just by building geo-prefixes i.e. without questioning the real cause of the scalability problem, nothing would be gained. Heiner
