On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Xu Xiaohu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some other proposal does not need an > id-locator mapping infrastructure. However, it requires every host to have a > FQDN name. In nature, the FQDN name plays the role of the identifier in the > resolution infrastructure, on behave of the IDENTIFIER of the session. This > way, two name entities together play the role of the identifier, with each > one of them suitable for different context.
If you you change the IP address so it has -only- locator semantics, what makes you think a DNS A record -isn't- an id, and the DNS -isn't- an id-locator mapping infrastructure? Regards, Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
