One of the topics that came up in Dublin during Lixia's talk was the
acceptability of renumbering. How do folks feel about an
architectural
solution requiring renumbering to retain scalability?
It will surely make new technology easier to deploy and scale better.
Will the bearer of the cost accept it? Well, it there is compelling
benefit, I think so. Do I think there is compelling benefits, again, I
think so.
And we think (the LISP crew) that single-homed sites that want to
become multi-homed sites will be willing to renumber. Will multi-homed
sites renumber for a loc/id split solution, I think it depends on how
simple it is to run the solution and hence provide the benefits we
have talked about before.
Now, the hard question is, will multi-homed sites who already have
renumbered with PI space, will they renumber again so if a PTR
solution is put in place, we can advertise less routes rather than
more for interworking purposes.
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
