Hi Peter, |> aggregation. For the cases that do require aggregation, it |would seem |> that you have to be willing to renumber end-user sites... | |That is just occurred to me: what if end users instead of ids |will get just a range. E.g. here is 64 least significant bits |for you to do whatever. Hence there is no need to support the |name space, users can renumber as much as they want while SP |could package ids with the access to those users who do not care. | |Then all decisions about hierarchy and layers concentrate on |prefixes that will be managed along the established RIR policies. | |What do you think?
I think that smells remarkably like ILNP. Tony -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
