Dino correctly points out that sites can avoid renumbering and
advertise
aggregates in the locator space. This would represent some amount of
savings. However, this would seem to affect the quality of routing
as when
such aggregates are injected back into legacy routing, it would create
stretch/TE issues. We've seen that folks deaggregate to address these
issues today. Could we address this somehow?
I said that?
You have to be clear which namespace I was talking about. When you say
"advertise aggregates" you need to say "advertise EID-prefix
aggregates". Is that what you intended to para-phrase?
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
