On 16 Jul 2007, at 12:14, Marcus Crafter wrote: > On 16/07/2007, at 9:11 PM, Tom Stuart wrote: >> On 16 Jul 2007, at 12:02, Marcus Crafter wrote: >>> <% content_for :blah do %> ..... <% end %> >>> It ends up in @content_for_blah, doesn't it? > I thought it did too, but that's a nil reference in the spec > unfortunately.
Well, it's an instance variable in the view, not your spec. This was discussed recently on rspec-users (starts at http://rubyforge.org/ pipermail/rspec-users/2007-June/002222.html and continues into July) with the general consensus being that you can write a helper or use instance_eval if you *really* want to access your view's instance variables, but that you're almost always better off specifying this sort of behaviour by expecting the output to show up in the place where it's meant to show up, e.g. have_tag() on the view that does yield :blah in your case, rather than fiddling about with state. Cheers, -Tom _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
