On 7/24/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/25/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/24/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm trying to test some code that has validates each and I've got a > very > > > strange failure > > > > > > > > Mock 'Book_1027' expected :store_with_privacy? with (#<Clip:0x1a99b96 > > > @name="Clip_1025">) but received it with (#<Clip:0x1a99b96 > > > @name="Clip_1025">) > > > > > > > > The Spec > > > > > > > > it "should check that a book can save a clip" do > > > > @user = mock_model( User, :id => 3 ) > > > > @clip = mock_model( Clip, :id => 1, :privacy => :public, :user => > > > @user ) > > > > @book = mock_model( Book, :id => 2, :privacy => :public, :user => > > > @user, :user_id => @user.id ) > > > > > > > > @book.should_receive ( :store_with_privacy? ).with( @clip ) > > > > > > > > clipping = Clipping.new( valid_clipping_attributes.with( :clip => > > > @clip, :book => @book ) ) > > > > clipping.valid? > > > > end > > > > > > > > And the model > > > > > > > > class Clipping < AR:B > > > > belongs_to :clip > > > > belongs_to :book > > > > ... > > > > > > > > validates_each :clip do |model, attr, value| > > > > if !model.book.nil? && !model.clip.nil? > > > > if !model.book.store_with_privacy?( model.clip > ) > > > > model.errors.add( :clip, "You can't add this item to this > book" ) > > > > end > > > > end > > > > end > > > > > > > > ... > > > > end > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on what might be causing that? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also found that by stubbing the @book.store_with_privacy? in a > before > > > block, and then having an example that just mocks that method > > > > > > @book.should_receive ( :store_with_privacy? ).with( @clip ) > > > > > > makes it act differently. In this case I get > > > > > > Mock 'Book_1026' expected :store_with_privacy? with (#<Clip:0x1a92aee > > > @name="Clip_1025">) once, but received it 0 times > > > > > > It seems that the stub is taking precedence over the should_receive > call. > > > > > > Is this expected behaviour? > > > > Absolutely not. Please submit a bug report to the tracker on this, > > with the examples you have here. > > > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=797 > > > > Thanks, > > David > > Done
Thanks > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
