I agree :)
On 8/17/07, Courtenay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's exactly my point; enforcing the difference between > should_receive vs stub! > > On 8/17/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what about template.should_receive(:current_user)? > > > > I don't know if that's a bad idea to do that in the before(:each) but > > it's more convenient.. > > > > On 8/17/07, Courtenay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you guys think of this: if someone calls should_receive > > > outside of an "it" block, it warns you. > > > > > > before(:each) do > > > @foo = Foo.new > > > @foo.should_receive(:monkeys) > > > end > > > > > > would warn you that you're setting an expectation in the wrong place, > > > and that "stub" is correct when setting up objects. > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > > courtenay > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rspec-users mailing list > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
