David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 8/19/07, Edward Ocampo-Gooding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a built-in way of describing a mock_model as being an instance,
>> beyond
>> stubbing the eval("Object.methods - Object.new.methods") methods to throw
>> NoMethodErrors?
>
> Huh? Can you give an example of what you are trying to achieve?
I'm writing a method that involves deciding if an object is a class or an
instance of a class. Right now I'm creating a mock_model and setting up an
expectation on respond_to? :new but I've got a feeling that this isn't the way
to go.
The current mock_model returns an object that looks more like a class based on
the methods it has (I should actually go look now and check if it's got the
typical instantiated Object methods too...), and I'm wondering if there's a
clean way of creating a mock_model instance that has typical instantiated
Object
methods and no Object class methods.
Edward
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
