Personally, I dont want to become an expert at the range of possible testing and mocking tools. I just want a solid framework to get my work done, recommended by experts like you. And the less different components I need to install and maintain, the better. So I prefer the integrated approach we've had in Rspec up to now.
Jonathan On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Zach Dennis wrote: > On 9/2/07, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think that makes sense. >> >> Which do you recommend? Flexmock or Mocha? >> > > I wouldn't recommend either of them by themselves, at least the > current way they sit. > > Jim Weirich may be adding globally ordered strict mocks, which if he > does then I think Flexmock will be the first mocking library in ruby > to cover all mocking needs (as far as I know). > > Mocha (and RSpec mocks too) don't support globally strict ordered > mocks. Hardmock is another mocking library which is just strict > mocking (no stubs, no partial mocks). Right now I prefer Mocha + > Hardmock, but I'm eagerly awaiting to see if Flexmock gets globally > strict ordered mocks. > > Zach Dennis > http://www.continuousthinking.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
