On 9/5/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> False Positives
> I just discovered how easy it was to create a false positive when I, trying
> my first RSpec test, did this:
> ob.should eql?('foo')
> instead of:
> ob.should eql('foo')
> or:
> ob.should == 'foo'
>
> As far as I can see, this is roughly equivalent to:
> ob.should false
>
> Neither eql?('foo') nor false causes the spec to fail; this is worrisome, as
> I can imagine accidentally including that ? again; and I'd hate it to mask a
> test failure.
Please report bugs to http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=797
>
> Autotest
> Out of curiosity, does anyone know how to get autotest to pick up new
> folders under spec/? Seems like I might have to modify rails_rspec.rb in
> lib/autotest. We were considering separating our acceptance tests from the
> rest.
>
> - Geoffrey
> --
> Geoffrey Wiseman
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
