On 9/8/07, Jeremy Stell-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Instead of : > > expected "<ul>\n <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n</ul>", got "<ul>\n > <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n </ul>" (using ==) > > could we make rspec exceptions look more like : > > expected "<ul>\n <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n</ul>", > got "<ul>\n <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n </ul>" (using ==)
Trunk's already doing this. Not released yet. > > or if that is too hard, even : > > expected > "<ul>\n <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n</ul>", got > "<ul>\n <li>red</li>\n <li>blue</li>\n </ul>" (using ==) > > then it becomes readily easy to scan the two values and see differences, as > opposed to (something I have done far too often in the last few months) > copying the diff, pasting it somewhere and manually doing this. > > I have looked at the --diff option, but it doesn't show how something has > changed, just where it has changed which is not quite what I want. > > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
