On 9/10/07, sudara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks David and Scott for your comments. > > @David: Your irb example worked great for exploring matchers. I was looking > for a way to be able to literally write my specs in the script/server > console, but I think at this point I'm almost good to go on DSL. > > @Scott: Yes, thanks for the tips. I'm aware that I can alias lambda - the > point was more "it would be helpful for incoming users digesting DSL / it is > more english-like" -I'll throw a patch in as David suggested - as soon as I > figure out why my rails fixtures are not loading due to the last svn up ;)
svn up again - I just fixed that > > Regarding the DSL being similar to Test::Unit - I'm sure it would be easier > to pick up Speccing coming from Test::Unit, but coming from nothing to a > ruby/rails/rspec, even when done slowly, requires a fair bit of trial and > error. Playing in the console is the most effective way (for me) to learn a > DSL inside and out. > > Thanks both for your time! > > sudara > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Rspec-Caveman-questions.-tf4387721.html#a12597802 > Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
