On 9/11/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html > > formatter/report? > > > > > > > Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work. It > would > > be nice if: > > > > The report contained pending messages, when specified, e.g.: > > > describe "Secure passwords with MD5" do > > > > > pending "Waiting on selection of an MD5 library." > > > > > end > > > > > The HTML report contains 'Secure passwords with MD5' as pending, but > does > > not add the explanation as to why. > > It would be nice to be able to use DHTML expansion to see the source of > the > > spec, sometimes; when we're doing walkthroughs with the customer > > representative, it's useful for him to be able to see the source as well > as > > the descriptions. - Geoffrey > > These are great suggestions. Please, please, please put these in > feature requests where they are guaranteed to stay on the radar and > not on this list where they are guaranteed to get lost in the shuffle. >
Sure; just wasn't sure if the people volunteering to look at the report were likely to use the tracker, but ... I guess as long as they appear in the tracker, that's the main thing, and then regardless of who implements them and when, it's captured. -- Geoffrey Wiseman
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
