On 9/14/07, Evan David Light <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using RSpec in anger for perhaps a total of a few days and just
> started playing with Story Runner. Love it.
>
> I also started working on a patch, which ought to be simple, to allow for
> Scenarios without supplied blocks to be treated as pending -- much like "it"
> in Spec::DSL::ExampleAPI.
>
> That said, I noticed something that seemed odd and chatted with Rein
> Henrichs a little about it on #rspec. ScenarioRunner#run treats "pending"
> scenarios as an error case. We both believed this to be a little odd as we
> both thought that pending would just be a branch and not an error. That
> said, I thought that there may be a reasonable explanation.
>
> Evan Light
> IMs (all): sleight42
> Twitter: elight
> http://evan.tiggerpalace.com
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
Hrm...I added
And "this should be pending" do
pending "need something else"
end
to the end of one of my stories and got:
And this should be pending
P
4 scenarios: 3 succeeded, 0 failed, 1 pending
I agree that it would be nice if story runner treats an empty
Given/When/Then as pending. But what do you mean it treats pending as
an error case?
Pat
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
