On 9/16/07, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going through Peepcode's Rspec Basics for an overview.
>
> He's just doing a simple spec:
>
> class PeepCode
> end
>
> describe PeepCode do
> it "should be awsome" do
> end
> end
>
> So running spec spec/simple_spec.rb should produce according to his screen
> cast:
> 1 example, 0 failures, 1 not implemented
I'm pretty sure that I saw the peep code and it showed the right thing
here - but I don't have time to go through it right this minute to
verify. That said, if that IS what the screencast says then the
screencast is wrong. You can get "Not implemented" with no block:
describe PeepCode do
it "should be awesome" # no block passed to the #it method
end
or by using the pending method inside the block:
describe PeepCode do
it "should be awesome" do
pending("for some reason")
...
end
end
or
describe PeepCode do
it "should be awesome" do
pending("for some reason") do
...
end
...
end
end
but an empty block (as in your example) just passes.
HTH,
David
>
> but I only recieve:
> 1 example, 0 failures
>
> Also spec spec/simple_spec.rb --format will fail
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:451:in `parse': missing
> argument: --format (OptionParser::MissingArgument)
>
> RSpec 1.0.8
> ZenTest 3.6.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
