On 9/19/07, Jed Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sprinkling my examples with 'lambda' has always seemed like a bit of a
> wart to me. I've gotten into the habit of adding 'alias :calling
> :lambda' to my spec suites. My examples then look like:
>
> calling { Foo }.should raise_error
> calling { Bar }.should_not raise_error
>
> Is there a reason that RSpec core has chosen not to make exception
> expectations more sugary?
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
There's actually a ticket that aliases it to running, I believe. So
specs would look like
running { Foo }.should raise_error
Pat
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
