On 9/28/07, sinclair bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following example:
>
>
> it 'should have a form with an action attribute' do
> response.should have_tag( "form[action=?]",
> '/users/1/machines/1/trouble_tickets')
> end
> for a form like so:
>
>
> <% form_for( :trouble_ticket,
> :url => { :action => 'create',
> :user_id => @machine.current_owner,
> :machine_id => @machine } ) do |f| %>
When you do this (:machine_id => @machine), rails calls
@machine.to_param. So as long as you're stubbing the to_param method,
it should work.
Also, if you use mock_model, this is stubbed for you.
Cheers,
David
> ...
>
> Now this fails.
>
> The way it will pass is to change the url parameters to _explicitly_ call
> the id method on the
> parameter values like so:
>
>
> <% form_for( :trouble_ticket,
> :url => { :action => 'create',
> :user_id => @ machine.current_owner.id,
> :machine_id => @machine.id } ) do |f| %>
> ...
>
> (nb. I am stubbing and mock these objects )
>
> My thought is that rails does not require this since it helps by making sure
> the #id of each object is used in the action url.
>
>
> Is this an error in rspec or just something (mildly inconsistent? ) which
> I'll have to do in this very limited context ?
>
> Cheers!
> sinclair
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
