Wait, actually it looks like OP is asking about top-quoting, and you're responding about top-posting. Top-posting is what I'm doing right now, and apparently is what OP would prefer?
I'm so confused now (especially after Shane's sideposting prank!). On 10/15/07, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point. Reminds me of this classic: > > A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of the discussion. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > > On 10/15/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sort of off-topic and don't mean to complain, but many on this list > > use top quoting. That works ok if you don't quote the whole previous > > thread. However, I'm finding that scrolling forever to locate the > > reply on longer threads is getting tedious. What's the rationale for > > top-quoting? > > > > Thx. > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
