On 10/18/07, Wincent Colaiuta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El 18/10/2007, a las 18:42, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > escribió: > > > Easier to type, sure. I'm not in love w/ the names yet though because > > they sound like verb phrases - "given matcher", "when matcher", "then > > matcher". > > > > How about something like match_given, match_when, match_then? > > That would be fine too. I mainly just wanted to avoid having to > manually pass the symbol in. > > Another alternative combining your suggestion with what Pat mentioned: > > step_matchers do |match| > match.given ... > match.when ... > match.then ... > end
That's nice, except we don't want methods named when and then as they are keywords :( We could do match.given, match.event and match.outcome, but that adds a mental mapping that we might want to avoid. > > Which has the nice side-effect of the user being able to say > "matcher" or "m" or "foo" if he or she wants. > > Cheers, > Wincent > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
