We have a similar one, which works like:
Foo.should have_association(:has_many, :conditions => "stuff", :through => :bazes) we started off with should have_many etc, but it became overcomplicated with all the various things that you may want - so we changed to have_association to make it simpler and ensure it will work with any/all association options http://pastie.caboo.se/108976 Russell Norris wrote: > I recently wrote a matcher for testing AR associations which allows > you to specify things like: > > Foo.should have_many(:bars).through(:bazes) > > I'm pretty darned proud of it and a couple of people have suggested > that I should submit it to the rspec_on_rails project. Before I go to > the trouble of writing out rdoc and fully spec'ing it, I just wanted > to make sure this was something the community would like. > > Instead of pasting in the code into the email, I thought I'd just make > a pastie and let those interested read it there: > http://pastie.caboo.se/108922 > > I think it would make a nice addition to the current Rails matchers. > Here's hoping you do too. > > RSL > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
