On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Steve wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:12:09 +0100, Matt Patterson wrote:
>
>> It occured to me that it would be nice to have a spec that would barf
>> if I ever nuked the layout's yield (or, indeed, one of its
>> content_for yields), mainly because they're the integration point
>> between layouts and views, and we're primarily testing them in
>> isolation (a good thing...)
>>
>> I was mainly wondering if anyone had some great practices in testing
>> those integration points, and layout stuff in general, that I could
>> learn from...
>>
>> Matt
>
> Was there ever any resolution on this? This would be a *very*
> beneficial
> capability to have for making sure views work as expected.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I'm not sure if this is what you're after but I've created this
custom matcher to my spec_helper.rb, then in my controller spec I can
say
it "should use application layout" do
do_it
response.should use_layout("application")
end
# custom matchers
#---------------------
class UseLayout
def initialize(expected)
@expected = 'layouts/' + expected
end
def matches?(controller)
@actual = controller.layout
[EMAIL PROTECTED](@expected)
@actual == @expected
end
def failure_message
return "use_layout expected [EMAIL PROTECTED], got #
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", @expected, @actual
end
def negeative_failure_message
return "use_layout expected [EMAIL PROTECTED] not to equal #
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", @expected, @actual
end
end
def use_layout(expected)
UseLayout.new(expected)
end
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
