be_success has the same semantics (and uses) Response#success? and that's not our API, but Rails'
If you don't like Rails' semantics you can make your own matcher, but I don't want to invent a whole new API on top of Rails in the official Spec::Rails. Aslak On Nov 10, 2007 5:31 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering if anyone else thinks that 'response.should be_success' is > potentially misleading. If you're writing a spec for an action that is > failing in some way it can still have a status 200. So while the > HTTP request was technically successful, something in the action > was not. Perhaps something like 'response.should have_success_status'? > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
